검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Article

Original Article

Progress in Medical Physics 2024; 35(4): 116-124

Published online December 31, 2024

https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2024.35.4.116

Copyright © Korean Society of Medical Physics.

A Commissioning Report on the Magnetic Resonance-Compatible Geneva Brachytherapy Applicator

Yoonsuk Huh1,2 , Hyojun Park1,2 , Jin Jegal1,2 , Inbum Lee1,2 , Jaeman Son1,2,3,4 , Seonghee Kang1,2,3 , Chang Heon Choi1,2,3 , Jung-in Kim1,2,3 , Hyeongmin Jin1,2,3,4

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 2Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 3Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 4Project Group of the Gijang Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Hyeongmin Jin
(hmjin@snu.ac.kr)
Tel: 82-2-2072-4160
Fax: 82-2-765-3317

Received: September 30, 2024; Revised: November 26, 2024; Accepted: December 11, 2024

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: Brachytherapy is essential for treating gynecological cancers as it offers precise radiation delivery to tumors while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The Geneva applicator, introduced in 2020 as a replacement for older models like the Utrecht applicator, enhances MRI-based brachytherapy with improved imaging capabilities and more accurate applicator placement. In 2021, updates to non-reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based 3D brachytherapy planning further promoted the adoption of advanced techniques such as the Geneva applicator. This study aims to commission the Geneva applicator, focusing on wall thickness, dummy marker positions, and source dwell positions to ensure accurate dose delivery and safety.
Methods: The commissioning process involved measuring wall thickness in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the tandem and lunar-shaped ovoid tubes and comparing these measurements with the manufacturer’s specifications. Dummy marker positions were verified using CT imaging, with a focus on alignment tolerances of ±1 mm. Source dwell positions were planned using the Oncentra treatment planning system, with measurements taken using EBT4 film and analyzed with RIT software.
Results: Wall thickness measurements and dummy marker positions were within the specified tolerance ranges, confirming their accuracy. The source dwell positions, measured and analyzed through multiple tests, were all within the ±1 mm tolerance, ensuring the applicator’s reliability.
Conclusions: The Geneva applicator met all standards for safe and effective use in brachytherapy. The use of a 3D-printed holder was crucial for precise alignment and measurement. With updated reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based brachytherapy, the Geneva applicator is expected to significantly impact the future of advanced brachytherapy treatments and research.

KeywordsMRI-based brachytherapy, Geneva applicator, EBT4 film, 3D-printed holder

Korean Society of Medical Physics

Vol.35 No.4
December 2024

pISSN 2508-4445
eISSN 2508-4453
Formerly ISSN 1226-5829

Frequency: Quarterly

Current Issue   |   Archives

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on :

  • line