검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Article

Original Article

Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2016; 27(4): 180-188

Published online December 31, 2016

Copyright © Korean Society of Medical Physics.

Dosimetric Validation of the Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation Algorithm for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans

So-Yeon Park*†‡, Jong Min Park*†‡§, Chang Heon Choi*†‡, Minsoo Chun*†‡∥, Jung-in Kim*†‡

*Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, §Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advance Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Received: November 22, 2016; Revised: December 6, 2016; Accepted: December 7, 2016

Abstract

Acuros XB advanced dose calculation algorithm (AXB, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) has been released recently and provided the advantages of speed and accuracy for dose calculation. For clinical use, it is important to investigate the dosimetric performance of AXB compared to the calculation algorithm of the previous version, Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Ten volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for each of the following cases were included: head and neck (H&N), prostate, spine, and lung. The spine and lung cases were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) technique. For all cases, the dose distributions were calculated using AAA and two dose reporting modes in AXB (dose-to-water, AXBw, and dose-to-medium, AXBm) with same plan parameters. For dosimetric evaluation, the dose-volumetric parameters were calculated for each planning target volume (PTV) and interested normal organs. The differences between AAA and AXB were statistically calculated with paired t-test. As a general trend, AXBw and AXBm showed dose underestimation as compared with AAA, which did not exceed within −3.5% and −4.5%, respectively. The maximum dose of PTV calculated by AXBw and AXBm was tended to be overestimated with the relative dose difference ranged from 1.6% to 4.6% for all cases. The absolute mean values of the relative dose differences were 1.1±1.2% and 2.0±1.2% when comparing between AAA and AXBw, and AAA and AXBm, respectively. For almost dose-volumetric parameters of PTV, the relative dose differences are statistically significant while there are no statistical significance for normal tissues. Both AXBw and AXBm was tended to underestimate dose for PTV and normal tissues compared to AAA. For analyzing two dose reporting modes in AXB, the dose distribution calculated by AXBw was similar to those of AAA when comparing the dose distributions between AAA and AXBm.

KeywordsAcuros XB advanced dose calculation algorithm, Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm, Volumetric modulated arc therapy, Dose-volumetric parameter

Korean Society of Medical Physics

Vol.35 No.3
September 2024

pISSN 2508-4445
eISSN 2508-4453
Formerly ISSN 1226-5829

Frequency: Quarterly

Current Issue   |   Archives

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on :

  • line