Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2013; 24(4): 295-302
Published online December 30, 2013
Copyright © Korean Society of Medical Physics.
Dong Wook Kim†, Jiwon Sung*†, Hyunho Lee*†, Myonggeun Yoon*, Weon Kuu Chung†, Sun Hyun Bae†, Dong Oh Shin‡, Kwangzoo Chung§, Young Kyung Lim∥, Donho Shin∥, Se Byeong Lee∥
김동욱†ㆍ성지원*†ㆍ이현호*†ㆍ윤명근*ㆍ정원규†ㆍ배선현†ㆍ신동오‡ㆍ정광주§ㆍ임영경∥ㆍ신동호∥ㆍ이세병∥
We estimated secondary scattered and leakage doses for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy (TOMO) in patients with liver cancer. Five liver patients were planned by IMRT, VMAT and TOMO. Secondary scatter (and leakage) dose and organ equivalent doses (OEDs) are measured and estimated at various points 20 to 80 cm from the iso-center by using radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter (RPLGD). The secondary dose per Gy from IMRT, VMAT and TOMO for liver cancer, measured 20 to 80 cm from the iso-center, are 0.01∼3.13, 0.03∼2.34 and 0.04∼1.29 cGy, respectively. The mean values of relative OED of secondary dose of VMAT and TOMO for five patients, which is normalized by IMRT, measured as 75.24% and 50.92% for thyroid, 75.14% and 40.61% for bowel, 72.30% and 47.77% for rectum, 76.21% and 49.93% for prostate. The secondary dose and OED from TOMO is relatively low to those from IMRT and VMAT. OED based estimation suggests that the secondary cancer risk from TOMO is less than or comparable to the risks from conventional IMRT and VMAT.
KeywordsLiver cancer, Scatter, Leakage, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Volumetric Arc therapy, Helical tomotherapy
pISSN 2508-4445
eISSN 2508-4453
Formerly ISSN 1226-5829
Frequency: Quarterly