Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Progress in Medical Physics 2024; 35(4): 89-97
Published online December 31, 2024
https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2024.35.4.89
Copyright © Korean Society of Medical Physics.
Hyojun Park1,2 , Jin Jegal1,2 , Yoonsuk Huh1,2 , Inbum Lee1,2 , Sung Hyun Lee1,2,3 , Chang Heon Choi1,2,3 , Jung-In Kim1,2,3 , Seonghee Kang1,2,3
Correspondence to:Seonghee Kang
(kangsh012@gmail.com)
Tel: 82-2-2072-2099
Fax: 82-2-765-3317
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry.
Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles.
Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used.
Conclusions: The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.
KeywordsSmall-field dosimetry, Dose gradient measurement, Ion chamber, Solid-state dosimeter
pISSN 2508-4445
eISSN 2508-4453
Formerly ISSN 1226-5829
Frequency: Quarterly