Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Progress in Medical Physics 2024; 35(4): 145-154
Published online December 31, 2024
https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2024.35.4.145
Copyright © Korean Society of Medical Physics.
Sohyun Ahn1,2 , So Eun Choi3 , Jeong-Heon Kim4,5,6 , Kwangwoo Park7 , Hai-Jeon Yoon8
Correspondence to:Sohyun Ahn
(mpsohyun@gmail.com)
Tel: 82-2-6986-6305
Fax: 82-0504-158-4052
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study investigated the use of synthetic computed tomography (CT) images derived from cone beam CT (CBCT) scans to analyze dose changes in breast cancer patients undergoing treatment and to evaluate the optimal timing for implementing adaptive radiotherapy.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on five breast cancer patients treated with tomotherapy-based volumetric-modulated arc therapy at Yongin Severance Hospital. Each patient received 15 fractions, with doses of 320 centigray (cGy) to the high-dose planning target volume (PTV) and 267 cGy to the low-dose PTV. Planning CT images were acquired using the Aquilion scanner, and CBCT images were captured with the VersaHD linear accelerator’s on-board imager. These images were registered in RayStation using a hybrid deformable image registration method to generate synthetic CT images. Dose distributions were reanalyzed using the synthetic CT images, and dosevolume histogram parameters, including the dose to 95% of the volume (D95) and mean dose (Dmean) for the PTV, as well as D95, Dmean, the percentage of the volume receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) for organs-at-risk (OARs), were extracted using MATLAB to assess dose changes during treatment.
Results: For the original plans, the mean D95 for PTV high across all patients was 287.13±31.32 cGy, while for PTV low, it was 245.53±6.21 cGy. In contrast, the adaptive plans yielded a mean D95 of 298.17±12.37 cGy for PTV High and 247.25±4.23 cGy for PTV low. The ART Plan may lead to increased dose exposure in certain structures, such as the spinal cord, while providing targeted improvements in reducing radiation exposure in specific OARs (e.g., contralateral breast and esophagus).
Conclusions: Synthetic CT images generated from CBCT scans provide a fast and efficient means of quantifying dose changes, supporting precise patient care through interfractional evaluation. Future studies will aim to apply this method to other organs and larger patient cohorts.
KeywordsSynthetic computed tomography generation, Adaptive radiotherapy, Breast cancer treatment, Dose-volumetric analysis, Cone beam computed tomography imaging
pISSN 2508-4445
eISSN 2508-4453
Formerly ISSN 1226-5829
Frequency: Quarterly