검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Article

Original Article

Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2009; 20(4): 191-198

Published online December 25, 2009

Copyright © Korean Society of Medical Physics.

Dosimetric Characteristics of Edge DetectorTM in Small Beam Dosimetry

소조사면 선량 계측을 위한 엣지검출기의 특성 분석

Kyung-Hwan Chang*, Bo-Ram Lee*, You-Hyun Kim*, Kyoung-Sik Choi, Jung-Seok Lee, Byung-Moon Park, Yong-Ki Bae, Semie Hong, Jeong-Woo Lee

장경환*ㆍ이보람*ㆍ김유현*ㆍ최경식ㆍ이정석ㆍ박병문ㆍ배용기ㆍ홍세미ㆍ이정우

*Department of Radiologic Science, Korea University, Seoul, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sam Anyang Medical Center, Anyang, Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

*고려대학교 방사선학과, 안양샘병원 방사선종양학과, 건국대학교병원 방사선종양학과

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated an edge detector for small-beam dosimetry. We measured the dose linearity, dose rate dependence, output factor, beam profiles, and percentage depth dose using an edge detector (Model 1118 Edge) for 6-MV photon beams at different field sizes and depths. The obtained values were compared with those obtained using a standard volume ionization chamber (CC13) and photon diode detector (PFD). The dose linearity results for the three detectors showed good agreement within 1%. The edge detector had the best linearity of ±0.08%. The edge detector and PFD showed little dose rate dependency throughout the range of 100∼600 MU/min, while CC13 showed a significant discrepancy of approximately −5% at 100 MU/min. The output factors of the three detectors showed good agreement within 1% for the tested field sizes. However, the output factor of CC13 compared to the other two detectors had a maximum difference of 21% for small field sizes (∼4×4 cm2). When analyzing the 20∼80% penumbra, the penumbra measured using CC13 was approximately two times wider than that using the edge detector for all field sizes. The width measured using PFD was approximately 30% wider for all field sizes. Compared to the edge detector, the 10∼90% penumbras measured using the CC13 and PFD were approximately 55% and 19% wider, respectively. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the edge detector was close to the real field size, while the other two detectors measured values that were 8∼10% greater for all field sizes. Percentage depth doses measured by the three detectors corresponded to each other for small beams. Based on the results, we consider the edge detector as an appropriate small-beam detector, while CC13 and PFD can lead to some errors when used for small beam fields under 4×4 cm2.

KeywordsEdge detector, Small beam, Penumbra

Korean Society of Medical Physics

Vol.35 No.3
September 2024

pISSN 2508-4445
eISSN 2508-4453
Formerly ISSN 1226-5829

Frequency: Quarterly

Current Issue   |   Archives

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on :

  • line